I've been meaning to make a post on this topic but put it off until I was reminded about it by the Wingard Report.
An article ran in the Oregonian a couple weeks ago that really is exhibit A for what is wrong with our elementary schools, colleges of education, state education departments and teacher certification agencies.
The article softpedaled the central point, but it was clear nonetheless: our schools have available to them reading and math programs that are absolutley proven to be effective, but the schools choose less effective programs because teachers don't like to teach the way the proven programs require.
In other words, they knowingly use ineffective programs to mollify teachers. Imagine if a hospital did the equivalent: choose ineffective therapies because the doctors found the effective ones to be professionally unrewarding. Wouldn't we call that malpractice?
The article starts out saying exactly this: "
"Two elementary school reform programs with roots in Oregon show the best evidence of raising student achievement, a new study commissioned by the
federal government shows, yet they are barely taught in Oregon classrooms."
I know something about these programs. The Arthur Academy charter schools, of which I am co-founder, uses one of them: the Direct Instruction Program based out of University of Oregon. This phonics based reading program and traditionally-sequenced math program is quite simply the most research validated elementary school curriculum in the history of mankind. (Believe it or not, that is not an overstatement.)
Yet the program is openly scorned by the vast majority of teachers and the colleges of education that train them. Even the University of Oregon college of education treats the Direct Instruction people there like some kind of family secret.
I've written about this for years. I got so frustrated by what I saw as an education establishment that shamefully ignored the overwhelming empirical evidence in favor of this program because of their own ideological aversion to direct teaching, that I decided to create a network of charter schools that used it, just to prove that it works.
The Arthur Academy Neighborhood Public Schools. Take a look at our results.
Then ask your elementary school principal if he or she has ever heard of Direct Instruction. You'll probably get a scornful smirk.
This is really a scandal.
Thursday, December 29, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
So let me guess - its the memorizing of scripts thats the sore point with teachers?
It always seems if anything ever intrudes on a teachers unions members ability to do whatever they want its fought in Oregon.
It makes you wonder why we don't stop calling them principals and just move on to calling them Office Mangagers of the schools.
I wonder if the people at Chalkboard are on to this?
Post a Comment