tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12596769.post5619019285957603036..comments2023-12-23T13:25:43.770-08:00Comments on Rob Kremer: The consumption policeRob Kremerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13842508120324878364noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12596769.post-30443719488623727252008-08-05T11:35:00.000-07:002008-08-05T11:35:00.000-07:00The category is: throwing stones from glass houses...The category is: throwing stones from glass houses ... the answer is: never.<BR/><BR/>The question is: When will the Newhouses (the out-of-state multibillionaire owners of The Funny Paper) tree-killers take responsibility for the environmental degradation they cause directly, for the paper-stream waste and pollution that results from their own product? (Who knows how many genetic mutations they cause?)<BR/><BR/>Never.<BR/><BR/>The O will never take responsibility for being wrong about anything. At least these ne'er-do-well do-gooders are consistent in their hyopcrisy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12596769.post-45079662945403673662008-08-02T17:58:00.000-07:002008-08-02T17:58:00.000-07:00As usual, a good read. I also wonder why folks ju...As usual, a good read. I also wonder why folks just go along.<BR/><BR/>THE last ice age 13,000 years ago took hold in just one year<BR/><BR/>Well, as we all know that human activity is responsible for all global climate change, this is rather a sobering look at just how quickly the human activities of 13,000 years ago destroyed the planet; plunging it into a global ice age in less than a years' time. What, exactly the humans at that time did to precipitate such a dramatic change remains unknown - lending credence to the idea that all human activity must be immediately halted in order to Save the Planet.MAX Redlinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12040240474444763721noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12596769.post-72972735832813491512008-08-01T09:07:00.000-07:002008-08-01T09:07:00.000-07:00Thanks Rob,Just more fun from our local politburea...Thanks Rob,<BR/><BR/>Just more fun from our local politbureau. Framing policy from polution or waste is admirable, but basing policy on man-made global warming is just deceptive and is a poor foundation. Many proponents of GW are now acknowledging that the signature atmospheric 'hot spots' do not exist, and thus man's role in GW is negligible at best. So why all the hype? Alterior motive, possibly. Fascistic governmental control, probably.<BR/><BR/>BrianAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com