tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12596769.post3284451552637319600..comments2023-12-23T13:25:43.770-08:00Comments on Rob Kremer: Krauthammer on Obama's stem cell orderRob Kremerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13842508120324878364noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12596769.post-9957867523550554362009-03-16T11:48:00.000-07:002009-03-16T11:48:00.000-07:00anon 12:09 is a knuckle dragging liberal moonbat. ...anon 12:09 is a knuckle dragging liberal moonbat. Incapable of following any discussion without attempting to dishonestly misdirect said conversation to a position of defending his own indefensible and silly argument.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12596769.post-79442536140673990552009-03-16T10:52:00.000-07:002009-03-16T10:52:00.000-07:00If one could extrapolate the exact conception date...If one could extrapolate the exact conception date, I'm sure some people night celebrate that as their birth day. So what?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12596769.post-72397161743134005492009-03-16T06:53:00.000-07:002009-03-16T06:53:00.000-07:00I must agree with Dr. Krauthammer and Rob. The who...I must agree with Dr. Krauthammer and Rob. The whole research is a very confusing and rather redundant way to learn something more. Adult SCR is much more advanced here and can provide a lot more answers, why not stay with that? <BR/><BR/><I>"If life begins at conception, why do we celebrate birth days and not conception days? When someone asks you how old you are, do you date it to your birth or your conception?"</I><BR/><BR/>Because we always celebrate events that we can see, that we can observe and be part of. We always celebrate results, not the beginning of something. Nevertheless, your questions are irrelevant anyways.<BR/><BR/>Take care, JulieAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12596769.post-35519460942994700942009-03-14T13:06:00.000-07:002009-03-14T13:06:00.000-07:00I think you miss the point of my post and Krathamm...I think you miss the point of my post and Krathammer's column. <BR/><BR/>The point is Obama's statements are clearly contradictory and hypocritical, and reveal a lack of depth and understanding of a complex moral/ethical issue than - guess who - George Bush showed in his own speech on the same issue.<BR/><BR/>The point is Obama's moral unseriousness compared to when Bush "painstakingly explained the balance of ethical and scientific goods he was trying to achieve."<BR/><BR/>I guess you didn't read it. Here is one of the many excellent points:<BR/><BR/>"Obama's address was morally unserious in the extreme. It was populated, as his didactic discourses always are, with a forest of straw men. Such as his admonition that we must resist the "false choice between sound science and moral values." Yet, exactly 2 minutes and 12 seconds later he went on to declare that he would never open the door to the "use of cloning for human reproduction."<BR/><BR/>Basically, Obama is being a demogogue. <BR/><BR/>Your questions are irrelevant to the point Krauthammer is making. He is pro-choice and not religious.Rob Kremerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13842508120324878364noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12596769.post-91374709500035987392009-03-14T12:09:00.000-07:002009-03-14T12:09:00.000-07:00I have a couple of questions for you Rob:What woul...I have a couple of questions for you Rob:<BR/><BR/>What would happen to these embryos if they're not used for stem cell research?<BR/><BR/>If life begins at conception, why do we celebrate birth days and not conception days? When someone asks you how old you are, do you date it to your birth or your conception?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com